What to know about suggestions for banning abortion pills and punishing women looking for an abortion – San Bernardino Sun County

By Jeff Mulvihil, Associated Press

Legislators in some states where abortions are already forbidden seek to explicitly abortion pills or to take a step that most leading abortion groups are opposed: they punish women who seek to end their pregnancy.

It is early in some legislative sessions to know if the measures will be given serious attention. But this shows that the political debate continues to develop after the Supreme Court’s ruling in 2022, which overturned ROE against Wade and opened the door for government abortion.

Here’s a look where things are:

Some legislators are aimed at pills that are used in most abortions

Legislators in several countries have introduced measures to classify drugs that Mifepriston and Misoprostol – used together in most abortions in the United States – as controlled hazardous substances, which makes a crime to possess them without recipes.

Louisiana last year became the first country to adopt such a law, despite the concerns of doctors claiming that restrictions will make it difficult for access to medicines to perform life -saving procedures.

Measures have been introduced in countries where Republicans control the government and where there are prohibitions on abortion at all stages of pregnancy, with some exceptions.

The legislation has died or seems unlikely to progress in Indiana and Mississippi.

Elsewhere – including Idaho, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Texas – it’s too early to know if they have a chance.

In Oklahoma, the governor Kevin Shield, an unwavering opponent of abortion, vowed to sign any measure to combat abortions coming to his desk.

And a scientist who follows the abortion policy said the bills could influence the debate, even if they did not occur inertia.

“The more they are introduced, the more normalized these types of accounts and similar types of concepts that insist, do,” says Laura Hermer, a professor at Mitchell Hamlin, the St. Paul, Minnesota School.

Combating pills roaring even without additional state laws

Authorities in two countries with strict abortion laws are directed to a doctor in New York for being claimed to have sent abortion pills to patients in these states.

Last month, a major Louisiana hearing charged Dr. Magi Carpenter on a criminal abortion charges with the help of abortion drugs, a crime. Texas General Prosecutor Ken Paxon filed a lawsuit against Carpenter in the civil court in such circumstances.

Legal actions create a law test in some Democrats controlled countries, including New York, who seek to protect healthcare providers who use telephones to prescribe and then send abortion pills to countries where they are where they are Forbidden. New York officials say they will not extradite the doctor to Louisiana.

Following Carpenter’s accusation, New York Governor Cathy Hochul signed a law that allows doctors to leave their names outside the recipes for abortion pills as a way of more isolation. Such legislation has been introduced in Maine.

Aidaho, Kansas and Missouri’s lawyers also sue the federal court to return the federal approvals for Mifepristone and the prescriptions for him by Telehealth.

Some defenders have called on President Donald Trump to apply a law of 1873 for a ban on mail or instruments used in abortion, but he did not.

While critics claim that drugs are dangerous, some major medical groups disagree. The American Obstetrician College Gynecologists says there is decades of evidence that Mifepriston and Misoprostol are safe and effective. The group cites a study showing that major adverse events such as significant infection and excessive blood loss are observed at less than 0.32% of patients taking Mifepristone for drug abortion. Medical organizations claim that Mifepristone safety is compared to that of over -the -counter pain medicine.

There are attempts to punish women, although they rarely acquire grip

The bills in several states will open the door for penalty accusations against women who are looking for or receiving abortions on charges, including murder.

This is a step that no country has so far taken and which leading abortion groups such as Susan B. Anthony Pro-life America and the National Life Right Commission are opposed.

Still, such bills were introduced in Idaho and Indiana, where they are unlikely to progress, and Oklahoma, North Dakota and South Carolina, where everyone is at the beginning of the legislative process.

South Carolina Senator Richard Cash, a sponsor of a bill introduced last week, which allows women who receive abortion, said it was aware that national groups were opposed to this aspect of legislation. But he disagrees.

“The bill does not separate women in any way,” he said in an interview. “The bill simply admits that if an unborn child is a person, anyone who participates in the murder of this human being should be responsible for the law.”

Associated Press Writers Rebecca Boone in Boyz, Idaho; Kimberly Cruisey in Nashville, Tennessee; Nadia Latan in Austin, Texas; Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City; Laura Hungar Louisville, Kentucky; And Isabella Volmert in Lansing, Michigan, have contributed to this article.