Trump is suing surveyed in Anne Selzer Ann Selzer and Des Moine Register newspaper – AOL

Washington – Donald Trump is suing Anne Selzer, her election company, the de Moine register and the newspaper’s mother company, Ganet, accusing them of consumer fraud, according to a copy of the submission reviewed by NBC News.

The claim, filed on Monday night in Polk County, Iowa, says he is seeking “accountability for insolent election intervention” during a poll on November 2, which has been shown by Kamala Harris over 3 percentage points in Iowa.

In the end, Trump won the state with double numbers, a difference that his lawyers argue in the case is “selective fiction”. The elected president makes a claim under the Consumer Fraud Act in Iowa, who prohibits fraudulent advertising.

“I do this because I feel like I have an obligation. I will wear it against the people in Iowa, their newspaper that had a very, very good anchor who fixed me all the time and then just before the election she said I would lose by 3 or 4 points, “Trump said, discussing the case on Monday.

Selzer announced after the election that he would stop choosing political competitions and move to other endeavors.

Media law experts were skeptical that the costume could be a great success.

“The chances of success here are thin for anyone, but winning in court is probably not the real goal of this case,” says Clay Calvert, an expert in media law and a professor at the University of Florida University. “The real motivation is to intimidate the press and journalists. Unfortunately, I suspect that this case is just a harbinger of the upcoming things. “

The claim states that “millions of Americans, including the plaintiff, residents of Iowa, and Iyovas, who contributed to the President Trump campaign and its related organizations (” Trump 2024 Campaign “) were deceived by the doctoral poll of Harris and that the “survey of the survey” were deceived by the doctoral poll of Harris “and that the” survey of the poll “were deceived by the doctoral poll of Harris” and that the “Miss vote” was not an amazing coincidence – was intentional. “

He attacks Selzer’s reputation as a standard-to-see poll, accusing her of trying to influence political races in favor of Democrats.

Rick Hassen, an election law expert at the UCLA Law School, immediately rejected the case.

“I don’t expect this case to go anywhere,” he wrote on his blog.