By james art 
Federal judge on Monday overturned the restrictions on traveling last week by the founder of the far -right oath of the Extimal Group, Stewart Rhodes, which forbade him to enter Washington, Colombia and the Capitol of the United States or its grounds without the court’s permission.
Rhodes was convicted of Seedt for conspiracy and other crimes from a federal hearing in 2022 in connection with the attack on the United States on January 6, 2021. He was sentenced to 18 years in prison by US District Judge Ait Mehta, who called Rhodes threatens the country and democracy.
President Trump in one of his first actions back to the service changed the sentence of Rhodes in time, served as part of the mass reconciliation for about 1500 people who participated in the Capitol rebellion. Rhodes was immediately released from prison after receiving his committee and soon appeared in the United States Capitol.
On Friday, Mehta imposed restrictions on the travel of Rhodes and seven other guardians of the oath, convicted in connection with the attack on January 6th. The order changed their release conditions by prohibiting them from entering Washington, Colombia or Capitol or its reasons.
On the same day, the new Trump -appointed lawyer in Washington, Colombia, Ed Martin, replied in a lawsuit that Rhodes is no longer subject to legal supervision for the president’s commutations.
Mehta on Monday dumped his previous order, imposing location restrictions and explaining his reasoning.
In a new line, Mehta stated that after the act of Trump’s mass pardon, “all relevant participants” moved forward, as if the trips were just turning to the time of the defendants in custody, not with the conditions of their controlled release.
The US probation services have begun to control the defendants, the defender moved to change the conditions of release and the Ministry of Justice responded to these requests, Mehta said.
Now, however, Mehta said it was “reasonable” to the Ministry of Justice to interpret Trump’s commutations on January 6 in order to cover the sentences of the defendants prison and to delete their conditions for controlled release.
This reading is further supported, writes Mehta, by the fact that Trump’s commutation order is unconditional.
“It is not this court to be a divine why President Trump has changed the defendants’ sentences or to judge whether it is wise to do so,” said Mehta’s order. “The only task of the court is to determine the effect of the law.”
Copyright 2025 NPR