The Federal Judge temporarily blocks the release of Jack Smith’s report on Trump’s criminal cases – AOL

A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocks the release of the final report of special lawyer Jack Smith about his duel criminal cases against the elected President Donald Trump.

South Florida District Judge Eileen Cannon, in an unsigned order, banned Prosecutor General Merrick Garland, Smith or all officials of the Ministry of Justice to publish the exhaustive details of Trump’s federal prosecutions.

The order will remain in force only up to three days after the Court of Appeal based on Atlanta to Whether Smith’s appointment as a special lawyer was unconstitutional.

Smith unprinted on two accusations against the former president two years ago: first, in South Florida in June 2023, for the alleged accumulation of classified documents after leaving office; Secondly, in Washington, Colombia County, in August 2023, for a supposedly conspiracy to cancel the 2020 election.

Cannon dismissed the case for Smith’s classified documents before the election last year, following that Smith had been incorrectly appointed by Garland without congress approval.

But two co-selecting President Walt Nauta and an employee of his Palm Beach, Florida, a resort, Carlos de Oliveira-staying on doom.

Their lawyers have urgently appealed as in the West Palm Beach division that Cannon is also watching the federal Court of Appeal to stop Smith to submit the report and Garland to release him.

Trump’s lawyers filed a brief “friend of the court” and on Tuesday, arguing that the release of Smith’s final report would intervene in the recent 47th efforts of the President’s transition.

Although Smith has indicated that he will resign Before the president’s elected president, his office still strives to try Nauta and de Oliveira for claiming a plot with Trump to conceal the sensitive files of intelligence and other classified materials in his Mar-A-A-A-A-A-Aw Lago.

In July, Smith appealed to the dismissal of the gun on the 11th round of classified documents accusations against Trump – but retreated after the great victory of the former president over Vice President Kamala Harris on November 5th.

US District Judge Tanya Chutkan in November dismissed the Trump case, which ended with Capitol’s rebellion on January 6, 2021. This charge included teammates.

But Smith never rejects accusations against Nauta and de Oliveira in South Florida.

The co-defenders’ legal team makes their appetizing appeal as part of the efforts to be thrown into their charges from the Supreme Court.

The release of Smith’s report will not only be shortened against the presumption of innocence for both of them – but also further against Cannon’s decision, which put an end to Trump’s prosecutor’s office in Florida first, according to Trump’s lawyers in their brief Amicus.

Cannon, who was nominated for the Trump federal bench during his first term, has determined that Smith was incorrectly appointed by Garland without voting for Congress, which should approve of funding for every special councilor as part of the bigger budget of The Ministry of Justice.

Cannon said her order was intended. “[t]o Keep the status quo as this court expects a resolution of the eleventh chain of similar emergency movement to prevent irreparable harm resulting from the circumstances described in the current record in this emergency position and to resolve a tidy and conscious sequence of events. “

She also directed a copy of him to be sent to Smith, Garland, US lawyer for the southern Florida District Markets Lapoant and clerk for the 11th round of appeal.

The 11th chain can choose to cancel its order.

“It’s time for Joe Biden and Merick Garland to do the right thing and to finally stop the political weapon of our justice system,” Trump spokesman Stephen Chang said on Tuesday.

“The American people have elected President Trump with a historical and predominant term, and we look forward to uniting our country in the new administration, as President Trump makes America great again.”

Repeat for doj declined to comment. Smith’s service did not immediately respond to a request for comment ..