By james art 
“So what makes this clear and explicitly around people who have to live outside can only mean that Fremont is trying to do something different,” he wrote in an email.
Defenders of people who are experiencing homelessness say that the proposed law would make it difficult for their work.
“If my staff gave someone a blanket to prevent it from freezing at night or a bottle of water, it would be considered a support, right?” Said Vivian Wan, CEO of Rebode Services, who runs a shelter and other housing programs in Fremont. “If we don’t reveal where someone is sleeping outside, it will be hidden?”
Fremont Mayor Raj Salvan has denied the plan’s characteristic as uniquely raw, pointing out that Fremont’s existing law is like other cities that prohibit people from supporting and supporting any violation of the code. He said that the language was restarted only in this ordinance in the name of transparency and rejected fears that the work of the defenders would be influenced.
“The goal is not to penalize people to give water or food or tent or some maintenance services,” he said. “Absolutely not.”
The goal, he said, is to give the city another tool for dealing with the camps that have received the most complaints.
“If someone is doing something that is not safe, we can say,” Hey, you can’t do it. ” And at least they will have some concern that there may be some consequences, “Salvan said.
Sabil Landrum, a lawyer of the East Bay Community Center for Homelessness of the Community Homelessness, claims that the ordinance is too wide, especially with regard to the inclusion of support and maintenance and private property. Private -owned planning bars for more than three consecutive nights, so Landrum said residents could potentially cite that a family member would stay in RV in their alley or put a tent in their backyard.