Seattle Bar Monkey Loft is trying to rejoice the return domain name – Domain Name

The domain was registered before the tape is switched on.

The Arbitration Forum National Panel found that Bar Bar Monkey’s Lounge Monkey Lounge tried to turn the abduction of the MonkeyLoft.com domain name.

Monkey Loft filed a cyberquate action against the domain name, although it was registered before the tape is included.

In order to win a cybercrection dispute under the unified policy of resolving a domain name, the applicant must show that the current registrant registered the domain after the applicant received trademark rights.

To circumvent this issue, the applicant claimed that the date of entry into force of registration was on December 29, 2021. However, a report by Domaintools Historical Whois clearly shows that the current registrant has owned the domain since at least January 2013. , which is months that months of months, which is months before the bar is turned on.

When finding a kidnapping domain name, panelist Stephen M. Levy noted:

Here the complaint, which is represented by a professional lawyer, “defends the effective date of registration of the disputed area is December 29, 2021”, despite its own evidence, the Domaintools report reflecting the respondent for a registrant of the disputed domain name on January 13 in January January 13. Nevertheless, such as Policy ¶ 4 (a) (III) requires a show that the disputed domain name is registered in bad faith, the applicant or his advisor or he knew or should know that it would be impossible, according to any argument over the present facts To satisfy the ordinary language of this subjunction and in such a way that it is not able to success against the name of the MonkeyLoft.com domain, despite the fact that it was registered or otherwise acquired by the defendant before the existence of its rights in the monkey attic Timest marking.

Attorney Stephen L. Rinehart is a bar. The search in UDRP.Tools shows that this is the fourth time when one of his customers has been found to have tried the abduction of a return domain name.

The owner of the domain name did not respond to the dispute.