By james art 
At the end of the 70s and the beginning of the 80s, the Chesapik Bay gained a mystery.
Numerous sorts of an unknown creature have caused concern and intrigue that the sea monster is lurking in the waters of Maryland and Virginia.
During a presentation at the Marine Museum of the Bay of Chesapik, the historian Eric A. Cheezum spoke about the “carefully modern monster” this year, discovering his discovery in the context of Times.
Cheezum began its presentation with a granular video that fills the screen with blue. Despite the poor quality of the video, many of the audience’s audience believe they have seen something moving in the video.
Taken from the Bay near Kent Island of Memory Day in 1982, the grainy video released shafts “at the International Cryptosology Company” or the study of hidden animals, Cheezum reported. Although this was not the first one, it was a big moment in the pop culture of Maryland.
Summer is described as a long, dark creature, smoothly as a snake that moves quickly through the water in motion, which is different from other snakes.
Robert and Karen Fu, the couple who filmed the video of what they believe was SSI were “relatively new transplants” on Kent Island, Cheezum said. They had a home on the shore and for them the bay was a place for relaxation.
Cheezum considers the camcorder the most notable part of Frews history. He said that the presence of such a camera on the east coast in 1982 was “at least as rare as a marine monster” because of the wealth needed to afford it.
The camcorder was a symbol of the change that happens on the east coast.
After the Second World War, the areas around Chesapiq Bay were developing very quickly, Cheezum said.
“And suddenly you have people in rural places that have never been in these places before,” he said.
The coastline also began to move from place to work. Almost all the people who claimed to have seen the nits were in the bay for relaxation, not the stink, who have worked on the water for generations.
Cheezum said this falls into the topic of “locals against outsiders”, with outsiders being tourists and suburbs. He also noted that during these siete films such as “Jaws” and “Piranha” were popular.
The investigator of the amateur chassis Wayne Loson said the reason why the aquatic people did not see chassis in the water is because they did not sit there, scanning the water. They had to do the job.
In 1993, manatay was discovered in the bay after swimming on the shore, Cheezum said. The Manatet that made this trip more than once was named Shsie.
Cheezum said he believes that people who have noticed chassis are very likely, actually see Manati.
“I hate being on my nose,” he said. “Because I want to believe it too.”
But even if the creature was a beanist, it formed Maryland’s culture. Cheezum mentioned chassis boats that people can take in the inner port of Baltimore. He talks about a children’s book with the participation of a chassis, which aims to teach children the importance of environmental protection.
In the 1970s, Marylanders began to appreciate the bay and her inheritance more, Cheezum said.
“And it is somehow it seems to be all over,” he said, “which is really strange, because there are about a million other things that could summarize the bay besides the marine monster.”
After the presentation of Cheezum, Joseph Campf – who now believes that shed was a manatiler who was calling for a marine monster – asked why the voors had never seen chassis if the creature was a manature all the time.
Cheezum replied that people see what they wanted to see.
“What is being observed is formed by the beholder,” he said.