close
close

Police video at Topeka Fatal Stoomwes Lands differently for Advocate and DA – Capital -Journal Topeka

Police video at Topeka Fatal Stoomwes Lands differently for Advocate and DA – Capital -Journal Topeka

The recently released video shows Taylor Lowry, a black man standing out and a wrench, while Topeka’s police officers opened fire on it in 2022, says Lawrence Max Cautsh’s lawyer.

District Prosecutor of Showney County Mike Kagai concluded that police had acted justified in the launch of 34 shots that killed Lowi, which Kagai said he was carrying a knife when he initially shot him, then cut it and raised a wrench, before the additional shots were fired.

However, the video of the police body shows that even if Lowi was wearing a wrench, several officers were at the scene so far and he no longer had a knife, Kautsh told Capital-Jurna.

“Certainly, the police could come up with a better way to solve the problem than to launch their weapons dozens of times in a public place with a lonely suspect,” he said.

The lawyer recently made Bodycam Video Public

Lowi, 33, was fatally shot in early October 13, 2022 in the parking lot of the KWIK store on 4500 SW Topeka Blvd. No one else was injured.

A video was recently provided by the police body of Larona reporters’ firing Lasister Sonders, a lawyer representing Laurie family members in an unlawful claim against defendants, which included Topeka’s city government.

The video shows that Lowry no longer wore a knife at the time he was shot, while the accompanying audio confirms that the officers knew that Lowry had a wrench only when they found fire, Cautsh told Capital-Journal on February 2.

He suggested that these facts were not accurately reflected in a message about KBI’s news, saying that Lowry was shot as he progressed to the officers holding a knife.

KBI Communications Director Melissa Underwood-which has released this edition-Zayavi in ​​a statement that she provided to the metropolitan journal that all the facts shared in the release are accurate, including the claim that Laurie has been shot as he has accused a police officer who holds a police officer who holds a police officer A knife over his head.

What does the video show?

Part of the video, which was recently made public shows, employees arriving early on the morning of October 13, 2022, when calling a mobile home of a woman on 4842 SW Topeka, Lot 6, where Lowi seemed to wear a knife and a wrench and refuse To cooperate with the police.

Lowi walked into the SUV and got in the Kwik Shop parking lot where Kagai’s report said he tried to get a woman out of a car, then lifted the knife he was carrying over his head, blamed a police sergeant and went down and went down S

“They visually depict this part of the event because the two TPD employees who intervened and stopped the load were not equipped with body chambers,” Underwood said. “However, at least one of the posted videos contains audio from the first rifle volume. Only the second rifle buzz was shot on the video after Mr. Lowry released the knife and raised the wrench.”

As the police failed to get the entire sequence of video events, the video tells only part of the story, Kagai told The Capital-Journal last week.

“The critical parts of the meeting were not included in the available video. Selective viewing does not provide a complete and accurate presentation of what happened,” he said. “In addition, numerous civil evidence of eyewitnesses confirm the statements of the police.”

Bodycam’s video shows Lowi after the second zalp lying on his stomach in the KWIK Shop batch, holding the wrench.

About one minute after the second volley, an officer can be heard to say, “We have numbers; He has a wrench. “

The video shows that the police subsequently urged Lowi to miss the wrench.

Then an officer approaches him from behind and Magiche’s hands behind his back.

Later, the video shows an employee who administers CPR for Lowry in the KWIK Shop batch.

Tale of two jury pools

Overland Park attorneys William and Pateten Denning last August filed an unlawful death case against defendants involving the town of Topeka on behalf of Lowi’s daughter, whom the complaint only defined as “LL” and her mother Da’mabrius Duncan, who is a special administrator for the mansion Lowi.

The plaintiffs want a court hearing to be held in Kansas City, Kansas.

The defendants want the process to be held in Topeka.

The jurors for federal trials in Topeka come from the county, Brown, Chase, Clay, Dickinson, Gary, Jackson, Jefferson, Lyon, Marshall, Maurice, Namaha, Potatomy, Riley, Vabansi and Washington, according to the Federal Website.

This site says that the jurors for federal trials in Kansas City, Kansas and Lebanevort come from the county Douglas, Wyandot, Johnson, Atison, Donifan, Franklin, Levert and Miami.

A modified version of the initial complaint filed on January 14th identifies the defendants in addition to the city as Topeka police officers Malcolm Gillum, Justin Goody and Bradley Empite, SGT. Scott Macentier and Detective Alex Wall.

Here’s how the video eventually gets disclosed

Topeca City Lawyer Amanda Stanley in February 2023 rejected the request of the Open Records Act in Kansas. The capital journal has applied for a Bodycam video video, while saying that its release “will not be in public interest.”

Transparency defender Cautsh expressed disappointment with this decision, which suggests that the release of a Bodycam video could shed new light on the case.

“The photo is worth a thousand words,” Kautsh said, adding that taxpayers have the right to challenge or check the district prosecutor’s conclusion that the shooting was justified.

The judge of the American magistrate Angel D. Mitchell then ordered December 13 that the city may not identify the overall video of Bodycam, made in place as confidential during the opening process in which the two parties to the court cases and information S

Lasister Sonders told a reporter to the journal capital on January 27 that he would provide him with footage from a camera if he requested these footage from Topeka’s city government, and then sent her confirmation that the city had refused his request.

The reporter asked the video later that day. City Prosecutor Stanley denied the reporter’s request in the late afternoon on January 30, saying the video was part of an active civil claim for which the Kansas Act allows the recording to be “closed discretionary”.

The Kansas Reflector website posted the video and article about it on January 31st.

Lassiter Saunders provided Capital-Journal with its permission later on January 31, to use video footage published online.

Parts of the video and an article were then published on February 1 on the NBC News website.

The city wants Lassiter Saunders to be punished for video provision

In a proposal submitted on Tuesday, the city’s attorneys and the five participating employees asked Mitchell to impose sanctions on Lassiter Saunders to release the video, stating that it had violated a protective order that was issued earlier in the case.

Nicholas Jefferson lawyers, representing the city, and Jeffrey Kulman, representing the five officers, asked Mitchell to impose six sanctions, including finding Lasiter Sonders for disrespect for court and publicly exhorts it.

“There can be no real argument that Da -Lasier Saunders did not break the court’s defense order,” the proposal said. “She turned footage from a body camera, parts of which are clearly confidential and are subject to the protective order of the press members. She did this for the wrong purposes to try this case in the court of public opinion and to influence the jury of the jury. “

No court documents have been filed in response to the request as of Wednesday.

What sanctions are being sought?

In addition to asking Lassiter Saunders in contempt for court and publicly exhorted, the proposal on Tuesday asks Mitchell to do the following:

  • Order Lassiter Saunders and the plaintiffs in the case to “disclose the full range of the documents they have released to third parties on this issue.”
  • Order Lassiter Saunders to destroy and return any detection materials provided in this case.
  • Prohibit Lassiter Saunders from participating in any earlier opening in the case.
  • They order Lassiter Saunders or the plaintiffs to pay the fees of the defendants’ attorneys who participate in the hearing on January 30 on the issue; Attorney fees made from the preparation of their subsequent proposal seeking sanctions; And preparing the proposal seeking a defensive order claiming Lasister Sonders has violated.

Contact Tim Hrenchir at [email protected] or 785-213-5934.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *