Policy
/ /
February 20, 2025
He is not satisfied with the control of the federal government, the President Political Action Committee suddenly spends big on decisive elections for the Wisconsin Supreme Court.

Elon Musk goes to the building of Eisenhower’s executive office near the White House in Washington, Colombia County, on Thursday, February 13, 2025.
(Stephanie Reinolds / Bloomberg via Getty Images)
Billionaires tend to buy what they want: mansions, yachts, spacecraft, communication platforms, connections that allow them to transform nations. This is a global reality in what will be remembered as the era of the renewed plutocracy. Modern oligarchs are influenced in different ways – in some nations, through direct bribery and shady business arrangements; In others with slightly more gentle democratic sensations through the type of election that former US Senator Ross Fienengold has long defined as a “legalized bribe”.
The leader of today’s billionaire class, Elon Musk, has used his wealth to get into the electoral processes of many countries -the most United States where the world in the world has spent 260 million dollars to secure the election for more -a minor billionaire as president. With the threat of additional costs against disagree republicans in Congress, Musk so intimidates one of the two major parties in the country that it is now widely regarded as leadership key state cases from perch as a “special civil servant of Donald Trump”.
But the billionaire born in South Africa seems to be not pleased with the huge role he has taken over to the federal government. Now he is also striving to influence the election at the state level – and thus, in order to increase the civil architecture of a country where the historical and constitutional mandate was for the separation of authorities guarded against excessive overcoming.
This week, supported by the Musk Committee for Political Action, which builds up the future of America, bought the reported $ 1.5 million advertising time in television stations in Wisconsin, where one of the most critical elections in 2025 will be resolved on April 1. The competition will be decided on April 1. The competition will be decided on April 1. The competition. is an open place in the powerful Supreme Court of the State, which currently has a 4-3 progressive majority. The senior member of the court, widely respected progressive justice, Anne Walsh Bradley stands. Running to replace her are the District Court of the Dine Susan Crawford District Court, which is supported by Bradley and dozens of current and former lawyers and forensic commissioners from all over Wisconsin and former Wisconsin Brad General General Prosecutor was appointed to the judge of the Woquesh County after He was defeated in his candidacy for re -election for AG for 2018.
If Crawford wins, the progressives will support their majority in court, which has been asked to prioritize cases related to abortion rights, labor rights and free and fair elections. Since Wisconsin is an intensively contested Battleground country, where five of the last seven presidential competitions have been resolved with less than 30,000 votes, court decisions have significant national consequences.
Fear that his anti -Union program could be detained, along with other policies that he and his right -wing legislative allies applied before voters to open him from office in 2018, Walker works extraordinarily to nationalize the Supreme Court race S He did not make a secret of his desire to make Conservatives outside Wisconsin be excited about Shimel’s offer, saying: “The April 1 election is important to those of us in Wisconsin, but it is also vital to the rest of the nation.”
The former governor’s message seems to have acquired a grip with right donors, including, Musk seems to be. The mega-millionaire made it clear that he preferred Shimel, even if he didn’t know much about how the Wisconsin elections were held. In January, after the court candidates submitted their petitions to board the newsletter, Musk tweets his platform X, “It is very important to vote Republican for the Supreme Court of Wisconsin to prevent fraud with a vote!”
Wisconsin voters choose candidates for the Supreme Court of the Party Bulletin, which means that it is not possible to vote this April on the Republican line – or on this issue, the democratic line.
Historically, court competitions in Wisconsin have seen that candidates are attracting bilateral support. This is less common in today’s hyperpartic era, when huge amounts of money from the state are poured into the court competitions of the state. As in the competition in 2023, which transferred the court from conservative to progressive control, this money tends to follow guerrilla lines. In addition to labor and business groups, state democratic and republican parties are increasingly active in court competitions. Crawford received impetus from wealthy democratic donors, while Shimel attracted significant support from the higher Republican funding. Much of the money came in the form of so -called. “Late independent costs”, such as $ 1.35 million to buy from Fair Courts, a group based in Illinois Crawford.
But the entry of the group, brought to Musk, roused things in Wisconsin, where media reports and political discussions have directed intensive control over the latest political move of the billionaire.
“Wisconsin is again the front line against a billionaire absorption of our democracy,” said State Senator Chris Larson, a Milwaukee Democrat, who is a long -time reform beection that will receive big money from politics. “On April 1, we have to stop Musk’s attempt to buy America from under us by choosing Susan Crawford.”
While Wisconsin’s conservatives thanked Musk-Zupulically as part of a bet to make him branched for more money before April 1, Crawford’s lager replied with a firm statement by spokesman Derrick Heniman. “At DC Elon, Musk took control of the private financial information of Americans and reduced funding for hungry children. Now Musk is trying to buy Brad Shimel and take control of the Supreme Court in Wisconsin so that Shimel can be enforced on an extreme program to ban abortion and collect corporations, “Hudenman said. “It is not surprising that Shimel was taking care of the support of shady special interests-he was already caught asking his knees for far-right donors to give him money, and now Elon seems to be responsible for his requests. Shimel has long records of coziness of corporations, including refusing to hold large medicinal companies for liability for the opioid epidemic that devastated our communities and receives more than $ 17,000 from the pharmaceutical industry. The Wisconsinites want justice of the Supreme Court, led by justice and common sense, not by an extreme politician like Brad Shimel. “
Popular
“Sliding left below to see more authors”Spend a finger →
The binding of Shimel with Musk can be a smart strategy. According to a new Economist/Yougov poll, a clear majority of Americans, look at Musk adversely – with margin 52-42. And the discomfort of the role of a billionaire in politics has accelerated in recent weeks. “This share, which says they have a very adverse opinion on Musk, has increased 7 percentage points over the past week to 43 percent of 36 percent,” the voting group explained. “This change was particularly expressed among independent and young adults.”
These are the voters that Crawford will have to increase their number in April. So Crawford’s campaign came out on Tuesday with fresh messages, which reads: “Shady Schimel has always been bought and paid – now Elon Musk is reducing the checks.”
From Nation
While Eric Adams refuses to resign, New Yorkers should consider other options, including – but not limited to – intervention by the governor of the state.
Eli mystal
Dismissing Guin Wilcox, Trump hopes the Supreme Court will annul 90 years of legal precedent and give him the power to fire members of independent councils.
Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg
Dismissing Guin Wilcox, Trump hopes the Supreme Court will annul 90 years of legal precedent and give him the power to dismiss members of independent councils.
Lynnhart
The bosses are itching everywhere to wage a dog -style war against their workers. That is why it is so important that Trump and Musk fail.
Eric Blanc
A conversation with the UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories about the ordinary facts of Israel’s war crimes.
Nadine Talaat