Bill to undress the right of Wyoming land owners to sell the Federal property in front of the Senate – Wyophile

Today, the Wyoming Senate is designated to consider a bill to regulate the sale of private land to the federal government, the critics of the measure say it erodes the fundamental property right.

The Senate staff on Thursday approved the Senate 105 file, the “State Territorial Sovereignty’s State Territorial Sovereign” Law, which will require the legislators of Wyomoming to approve any sale of the Federal Government’s property. The Committee on Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources of the Senate An advanced bill with 4-1 votes for the objections of the Wyoming Shares Association.

Senator Bob is coming, R-Casper, the leading sponsor of the bill, said that “if the government wants to buy more land within the states, they must obtain this consent from the state legislative body.” IDE is a member of the Committee of the AG and the developer of commercial real estate.

The Senate file 105 is based on the interpretation of the US Constitution, which, according to IDE, allows only the federal government to own the property used for its powers listed. The Constitution lists these powers as things such as taxing, spelling money, punishing pirates, maintaining a post office and military, among several others. The government has authority over 10 square miles in Washington, Colombia County, but must be agreed by countries to own property that have not been set to achieve the powers listed, he told the committee.

According to the bill, a person who will sell land to the federal government will present details of the legislature, which will then “review and see if [the sale] is constitutional or not, “he said. The bill requires “evidence that the federal government will acquire real property in that country according to the listed constitutional power” in order to complete a sale, the bill said.

“If a person fails to present this information and switched to his transaction, they are essentially endangered by the loss of money they have received for that sale,” Come said.

Fundamental law

The Executive Vice President of the Wyoming Share Association Association said the group was “strongly opposed” the bill as prepared.

“To say that the private owner of land that exercises [a] Right to private property, which is essential to our country and for our nation that they are the guilty party if they do not receive prior approval from the state – and then such a severe punishment that they stand to lose the whole amount of the value which They get for their property – it’s just something beyond what we can support, “he said.

“The private owner of the land is the one who pays the price,” Magnya said, “This is not appropriate.”

The bill will also stimulate simple efforts for public access-the essays to obtain hunting easements, recreation and other things, ”he said.

“Even this simple step will require this burdensome process under the conditions we find in this bill,” Magagna told the group, who called for him to work on changes when the measure reached the Senate floor.

Sens. Tim French, R-Powell; Troy McKeown, R-Gillette and Laura Pearson, R-Kemmerer, supported the account with IDE. Senator Barry Crago, R-Buffalo, voted against it.

The Protection Group also criticizes the newsletter measure, saying that the IDE bill will erode the rights of landowners, will damage the property values ​​and limit public access. “In fact, this will limit access to new public lands and have destroyed the rights of private landowners to sell their land to anyone, including for conservation purposes,” said the Outdoor Council at Action Alert.

The Senate has scheduled the measure, along with other bills, for a debate on the floor of a session that begins at noon today.

The interpretation of the constitution goes

IDE is also a leading sponsor of the resolution that requires congress to turn over 30 million federal acres into Wyoming, including the Grand Teton National Park, in the country. This measure makes its way through the above house with the support of 16 senators.

Meanwhile, the Chamber has accepted Bill 118 of the Chamber, “restrictions on net profits from the Earth for the Federal Government”, which will ban deals on land in Wyoming, which lead to net profit from the area for the federal government. It heads to the Senate.

Real Estate Agent and Landman, IDE said it believes that the enclave clause of Article 1, Section 8 of the US Constitution, clearly prohibits the most fated ownership of the land. This is the same unconventional position accepted by Amon Bundy during and after the occupation of the national asylum of the wild in Oregon. Many legal scientists and courts do not agree with this interpretation.

“I’ve been exploring it a lot over the last few years,” he said. “I studied it widely with many experts.”

“Half of our surface is owned by the federal government and 70% of our mineral mansion,” he said.

“The actual constitutional relations between the United States and the land within the countries were intended to be restricted until some specific delegated goal of Article 1,” he said. “This is undoubtedly why the enclave clause … limits the goals for which lands can be acquired in the United States, for its ports, magazines, arsenals, until other necessary buildings.”