The Editor of the First Things claims Pope Francis’ letter to the bishops encourages “open boundaries” – Catholic recognized org

CV News Feed // In an essay published on Tuesday, First things RR editor Renault argues Pope Francis’ letter to the US bishops on the immigration crisis “avoids the nuance” in an attempt to encourage an ideological project for globalization.

Renault’s essay, entitled Pope Francis’ Apocalyptic Dream, provides a detailed analysis of the papal letter, in which the Pope expresses his opposition to the implementation of the Trump administration of immigration laws.

As Catholicvote reported, “in an unexpected letter to the US bishops of February 10, Pope Francis expressed concern about initiatives to deport the Trump administration and their impact on the vulnerable population and seems to criticize the interpretation of Vice President JD Vance by Ordo Amoris.”

The Pope’s message is a “recipe for church self -destruction”, according to Renault, a “suicide note” in the “form of a letter”.

Renault confirmed the Pope’s statements about human dignity, while criticizing his letter for failing to properly apply them to American politics.

In his letter, the Pope claims that “a properly formed conscience cannot but make a critical judgment and express his disagreement with any measure that tacitly or explicitly identifies the illegal status of some migrants with crime.”

Renault claims that the statement is the claim that the laws limiting immigration is unfair because their breach is not a crime.

“According to this logic, without rapists and murderers (whom Francis allows can be kept from a country), everyone has the right to migrate,” Renault wrote. “The Holy Father insists that we should not apply the laws of immigration. To do this, it would make us “surrender to stories that discriminate against.” This is the same justification for not applying laws against theft of theft. ”

Renault claims that the letter is representative of a broader trend in the thinking of Pope Francis, which tends to be aligned with the progressive ideals, not with the realities living in the daily loyal ones.

According to the consequences of Pope Francis’ letter, the “globalist, open border” is presented as the only acceptable view for Christians who really “worship the universal love of Christ.”

Renault pointed out the real consequences of mass migration, neglected by the pope’s vision of “utopian cosmopolitan”.

According to Renault, “newcomers overload social services, increase the costs of housing and contribute to the sense of disposal among those born in kinship.” Meanwhile, wealthy elites remain unaffected, living in what Renault called a “white car”, isolated from the social strain, which migration puts on the poor.

Beyond the immediate debate on immigration, Renault claims that Pope Francis has a “apocalyptic dream of the West”, providing for its foundations to be canceled by mass migration and environmental danger.

Pope Francis Is “Someone Who Catastrophe Rather Than Appealing to Catholic Social Doctrine to Make Nuance Judgments That Might Humanize,” Reno Argued, ” Al That Attends Rapid Demographic Change, and The Disorder It will bring. ”

Renault wrote that Pope Francis’ position on immigration requires Americans to reject patriotism, love for the country and take care of fellow citizens. “I’m not envying the bishops of America,” Renault concluded. “It is a difficult task to require the faithful to attend the liturgy so that they can be told that you love someone’s country and its citizens is an wicked sin. This is a recipe for church suicide. ”