AI Action Summit: Why is the Notre Dame Method, not St. Paul – Calculations

The world must move quickly and not break anything

The AI ​​Action summit in Paris hosted great ideas and high ideals, but not all are on board, writes Amanda Brock at Openuk.

President Emanuel Macron ended the first day of the AI ​​summit in Paris, promising to use Notre Dame de Paris strategy, citing the quick reconstruction of Notre Dame Cathedral only five years after his destruction in flame.

Macron said “France will show the rest of the world” that he can engage in a clear timeline and provide a clear strategy, such as someone who is responsible, guarantees that delivery. Honestly, everything was very impressive.

Image

Description

President Macron urged the world to “turn on, dear, Tap” as he emphasized the benefits of France in clean energy

The summit has led to big messages – more specifically, the current AI Foundation, with $ 400 million in funding and a target of $ 2.5 billion for publicly good AI and focus on data.

In addition, “Roost” (stable open source safety tools) will see open code for AI safety code. This means using tools, not rules for managing management in the way engineers understand, although you do not load them with excessive compliance requirements. Open supply software tools means that they become joint and accessible to all.

While France wants to lead this global revolution from Europe – and Razzmatazz at the Action Summit is the right way to catalyze this – the event itself is nothing more than the start line. The path forward is long and will only work with the right degree of cooperation.

The importance of cooperation was correctly recognized as the results in a way that the United Kingdom has not failed so far, to admit, even though it has begun the peak process in Blackli in 2023.

Image

Description

Roost aims to provide an open code for AI for AI

The difference between the two top matches is great. One was a small, closed group in a rural, albeit historical location, with AI safety declaration. The other was a huge event in the heart of a city that would inspire the world with a series of big messages, with the background of the huge Grand Palais.

Open Sourcing Inspect – the LLM Evaluation Platform of the United Kingdom Safety Institute – in May 2024 it was a stroke of the genius. This is something that Rishi Sunak is lagging behind, reaching out to write this: “We are a source. Open code manages innovation. It creates start -ups. It creates communities. There must be a very high strip for any open source restrictions. That is why the AI ​​Safety Institute today finds that he has built what he has built. “

Inspection Project Code – AI’s safety framework framework – is now available to anyone who can use.

It is alleged that the UK Safety Institute in the UK also announces open -off -code plans that will unite experts about how to study open code and safety tools. This would make it easier for the United Kingdom to lead cooperation in Big Tech and Smes. However, this open day has never happened, given the changes caused by the general election and a new party that took over the government.

We quickly forward for 10 months and watch the President Macron team build what it takes to use its own and the ideas of the United Kingdom. This is the joy of innovation and openness. In an open code, we say about commercialization that you allow your competitors with your own innovation.

It is the same in AI and his future. Being first matters, but building something of that scale is.

Traveling back from Paris, exhausted by the ruthless irreplaceable fringe events, as well as from the main summit, I opened my Eurostar Tatler magazine. There an article called “Hot Dame” examines the work of a British carpenter to restore Notre Dame. This work was “welcomed as a triumph for French workmanship. But sometimes it will only make the best of the British. “

We also see too often with our leaders in technology. London Demis Hasabis and Laura Gilbert and Toran Bruce Richards of Scotland are great examples of AI’s British geniuses that underlie the global AI revolution, but their critical roles and experiences are easy to miss. They are not just a few individuals we mean here, but the position of the United Kingdom within the open code and AI global communities.

Image

Description

The tranquility before the storm

At the end of the summit, the United Kingdom and the United States refused to sign the summary, while 60 other countries did so. The declaration requires signature to ensure that “AI is open, inclusive, transparent, ethical, safe, secure and reliable, taking into account international frameworks for all” and that it makes “AI resilient to humans and planet”.

While the declaration can, as the United Kingdom statement says, does not go far enough for safety, its support shows what is set out if we do not try to follow this time.

In any case, even if the United Kingdom has not signed the declaration as a leader of Europe in the open source software, this is in the nature of the United Kingdom, if not our DNA – and our best interest – to get involved in the efforts for the efforts for Cooperation.

The United Kingdom and open source global communities will work with Martin Tisen, Camille Francois and their teams as they build “current AI” and “Roost” to ensure that our AI futures are open in public interest.

Macron said France should “include, baby, plug” as part of the European goal around AI. In order to support the success of opening AI for the public good, we must now “cooperate, dear, to cooperate.”

Amanda Brock is the CEO of Openuk, who has just released his AI opening report.