The United Kingdom does not seem to have signed the Declaration of Leaders of the AI ​​Summit

The United Kingdom has been reported that the UK will not sign the declaration after the United States has been reported to have expressed concerns about the wording, which is said to include references to “sustainable and inclusive AI”.

Downing Street will not comment on live discussions in Paris, as reports from the summit say the United Kingdom and the United States have refused to support the statement.

But the official spokesman for the Prime Minister told reporters in Westminster: “We will only register for initiatives that are in the national interests of the United Kingdom.”

The spokesman said the government “worked with the French throughout this process” and “they remain one of our closest partners in all areas of AI.”

World leaders, technology leaders, civil society and scientists have been talking for two days in the French capital because of the present progress and the future direction of technology.

Prime Minister Sir Kyar Starmer chose not to attend the summit, although technology secretary Peter Kyle was in Paris, where he said he would talk to international partners about cementing the United Kingdom as a “AI pioneer”.

Earlier on Tuesday, US Vice President J.

This seems to be contrary to the French President Emmanuel Macron, who uses his role as hosting the summit to summon for more international technology cooperation, but also “intelligent regulation”, saying that there is a “need for rules”, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules, for rules. To ensure the safe development of AI tools.

Vance said that too much AI regulation could “kill the transformative industry, just when it takes off” and calls for Europe to “look at this new border with optimism, not awe.”

As he said the US was open to working with others on AI, it seems that D -Vance was calling on other countries not to work with China on AI.

“Some authoritarian regimes have stolen and used AI to strengthen their military intelligence and surveillance capabilities, cover foreign data and create propaganda to undermine other nations national security,” he said.

“I want to be clear, this administration will block such efforts.”

He added: “And today I will remind our international friends that by partnering with similar regimes, it never pays off in the long run, from CCTV to 5G equipment, we are all familiar with cheap technologies on the market, which is highly subsidized and exported by authoritarian regimes.

“But as I know and I think some of this, some of us in this room have learned from experience, partnership with them means to connect your nation to an authoritarian master who seeks to penetrate, dig and take over your information infrastructure S Should a deal look too good to be true?

“Just remember the old saying we learned in the Silicon Valley – if you don’t pay for the product, you are the product.”

An expert in the industry said that the obvious decision of the United Kingdom not to sign the declaration will “undermine” its reputation as a global leader in the AI ​​sector.

Andrew Dudfield, head of AI in the charity charity, said: “By refusing to sign today’s International Declaration of Actions by the AI, the United Kingdom government risks undercuting its hard -to -earn confidence as the world leader of safe, ethical and reliable II innovations.

“Verification of facts around the world work hard to put AI at the heart of our efforts to improve the online information environment, but we need bolder government actions to protect people from corrosive AI misinformation that can harm of public health and to disrupt democracy in unprecedented information speed and scale.

“Ministers cannot afford to allow existing policy patchwork to continue, leaving critical decisions on how to define, label and process misleading information generated by AI to technology companies themselves, especially since the United Kingdom is still developing its policies and risks that are lagging behind. “