Some federal health websites have recovered, others still down, after cleaning data – public radio in South Carolina

Scientists and leaders of public health take stock of the sharp decision of the Trump administration to download web pages, data sets and selected information from the federal health websites.

Some of the pages of the Website of the Disease Control and Prevention Center, which were offline last week last week, reappeared.

The Atlas tool used by politicians to track the percentage of infectious diseases such as HIV and PPI has disappeared, but now it’s back. Pages that explained the system of monitoring the risk behavior of a youth that monitors the health of adolescents, but now it can to see again. And the CDC data site, which was taken offline over the weekend, returns to data available for download data.

But there is uncertainty about what may be different.

“Throughout the country, people like me are trying to catalog what is missing and what has changed in terms of what is backup,” says Dr. Megan Rani, an emergency doctor and dean of the University of Public Health School Yale.

Some of them are obvious, she says – broken ties and pages that are no longer there. She has noticed how some pages are cleaned of certain words or categories of people. For example, the pages of the CDC website, which previously referred to “pregnant people”, relate to “pregnant women”. But she notes, researchers systematically compare archival data to updated data sets that have been repaired online.

Meanwhile, other pages – including an instrument that evaluates social factors that make communities vulnerable in the event of a disaster – remain offline. In other cases, such as the system for monitoring the risk behavior of youth, the pages seem to be restored, but the key links to the results are dead.

In response to a request for a comment on the missing and modified content of its website, a CDC speaker wrote in an email: “All changes to the HHS website and the HHS department websites are in line with President Trump’s executive orders on January 20, protecting women from Women from gender extremism and restoration of biological truth about the federal government and the termination of radical and wasteful government programs for DEI and preferences.

President Trump’s executive orders on gender and diversity, justice and inclusion have sparked a cleaning that covers many of the agencies controlled by the Ministry of Health and Human Services.

This move has traveled a lot of resources on the CDC website, ranging from the health data of adolescents and infectious diseases to the clinical guidelines for reproductive care and HIV.

However, the entire agency’s website carries a warning: “The CDC website is changing to comply with President Trump’s executive orders.”

Fight to save vital data sets

The space of changes from last week broke out quickly from the entire scientific and medical community.

“This is completely unprecedented,” says Dr. R. Shah, a senior scientist at Stanford University and a former Commissioner of the State Department of Health in New York. “In fact, we darken the lights on our ability to protect and maintain the health of all Americans.”

As the news spread late last week, so made efforts throughout the Internet among scientists, journalists and concerned citizens to archive data straps and web pages. Some of the clinical guidelines, such as those of reproductive health, are now hosting medical groups, including the US Congress of Obstetrician and Gynecologists.

A group at Harvard University is one of the few efforts among academics to retain the data and maintain it available. Jonathan Gilmore, according to a scientist at Harvard Th Chan School of Public Health, helped organize Datathon to help preserve health data on January 31st. He says the data savings began in November 2024, but were not completed by Friday.

“These federal websites are gigantic and lead to terbytes of data,” he says. While they have been able to retain certain tools and data sets, “we are still not sure to what extent we have shot all web pages that have disappeared,” he says.

Meanwhile, doctors for America, a progressive advocacy group representing doctors, filed a lawsuit against federal health agencies in response to the “sudden without notice” on web pages and data sets.

The trial claims that this violates the Law on Administrative Procedures and the Law on Documents Reduction, according to James Hodge, Director of the ASU Public Health Center for Public Health.

“Both arguments may have some credit, but they also seem just initial ‘bow photos’ related to the bigger legal problems when playing,” he wrote in an email to NPR. Hodge provides for wider legal challenges regarding the constitutionality of the executive orders of President Trump and the rights of the first public amendment to access government information, among others.

CDC advisers require explanations

Chess and others sitting in the CDC Advisory Committee to the Director have requested the executive director of CDC Susan Monres, appointed to Trump, to explain why the data were downloaded and plans to protect and restore access to it.

Commission members requested a written response by February 7, according to a copy of the letter reviewed by NPR. So far, says Shah, they haven’t heard yet.

Dr. Per Perhawkite, Dean of the Rutgers Public Health School, says he was struck by the “gambling” way in which the sites were cleaned or downloaded.

“I think the restrictions are being tested, “he says.” The question is how much it will be tolerated. ”

Halkitis is now worried about the future of other critical databases maintained by the federal government, including the National Pubmed Health Institutes, which houses millions of manuscripts related to biomedical literature.

“Those of us who make science with a marginalized population will have to collect it in some way from our own research,” Halkit says, noting that he and his colleagues have encountered to download HIV data last week in anticipation that the references To gender and race, both are key to understanding the epidemiology of the disease, can be eliminated.

Fallout will stimulate public health

The loss of basic data on the outbreaks of infectious diseases affects the US public, beyond certain populations that seem to be directed, says Dr. Josh Baroque, an infectious disease doctor and a public health researcher at the University of Colorado.

“This data helps us to understand as scientists and clinicians, where they are infectious diseases and outbreaks, so even if you are not part of this group, it helps us keep you,” he says.

The lack of communication for this data and information about information also violates the connection between CDC and its partners, says Shah.

“All the work that happens between scientists, communities, CDC and others takes decades to upgrade confidence, and trust is based on transparency. This trust is broken,” he says.

Irma Elo, a sociologist at the University of Pennsylvania, points out that these data belongs to taxpayers – and this is acting to the federal government to maintain its integrity.

“The government must recover all the data that has previously been collected and made available,” says Elo, who is the president of the American Population Association, who protests against the changes made by the Trump Administration. It describes the federal statistical system that collects the population and healthcare census as “the only independent source of data we have.”

“You can’t just replace it without having a huge flow of resources,” she says, or without the expertise of statistical agencies who have collected and published this data for decades.

Copyright 2025 NPR