close
close

Wyoming is looking for Federal Land for Land, Utah wants to run national parks – the traveler of national parks

Wyoming is looking for Federal Land for Land, Utah wants to run national parks – the traveler of national parks

Sunrise over Grand, Grand Teton / Rebecca Latson National Park

Wyoming’s legislation has a move to ask the congress to give the Grand Teton National Park and other federal lands, in the Cowboy State/Rebecca Latson file

Legislators in two Western states have a look at the federal lands, with Wyoming’s legislation asked to approve of a resolution that all federal lands in the Cowboy State, with the exception of Yellowstone National Park, are reversed while Utah’s legislators are asked to stand behind A measure calling for them to “manage” national parks in their country.

How much grip the two efforts to see, but they fall apart – at least in Wyoming and Utah – a furore to gain control of millions of acres of public land managed by the National Park Service, the US Forestry Office, the Land Management Office and other federal ground agencies.

The measures come as a result of Utah’s unsuccessful efforts to make the US Supreme Court agree to consider a hive state, challenging the ownership of the federal government of millions of acres of land in the country.

The US Supreme Court, without development, declined to consider Utah’s court case

Wyoming officials supported Utah’s efforts … But they made the request further, looking for all federal lands in their country.

Last week, the Committee on Agriculture, State and Public Lands and Water Resources of the Vayoming Legislative Authority voted 4-1 in support of a resolution with a congress request to give way to all federal lands, except for Yellowstone, which was created before Wyoming winning statehood. Among the lands that the resolution is looking for are the Grand Teton National Park and the Devils Tower National Monument, along with the national forest lands and lawns. The resolution also strives for the underground rights of minerals owned by the federal government.

In Utah, State representative Steve Eliasson said he would introduce a resolution calling for the state to run five National Parks, Canyon Bryce, Canylands, Capitol Rif and Zion. Driving the legislator is the lag of maintenance in the five parks, which he put at $ 400 million.

“This could be decades if at all, if the federal government is financing these fabulous resources enough,” the Republican told Fox 13 of Salt Lake City, adding that the state could help deal with this lag.

The staff of the National Park Protection Association did not agree with the approach of the policy.

“I care about our national parks and guarantees that they are also funded to the staff of the Congress shoulders,” said Corey McNultti, Director of the NPCA campaign for the southwestern region, in front of the southwest region, said Corey McNetti, Director of the Campaign Campaign of NPCA for southwest Traveler In an email. “A resolution calling on the powerful members of the Utah Congress to finance the National Park Service, to raise the renting of seasonal employees and the renewal of funding for the delayed retardation in maintenance will ensure that our national parks in Utah are ready to welcome over 15 million visitors The edema around the world this year and in the future.

“The state can help national parks by calling on the congress delegation to ensure that the parks are being operated on their gold standard, as visitors expect,” she added. “The short -term patchwork management scheme, which will drink money from national parks, does not help parks, visitors or jute.”

The two resolutions of the United States are reminiscent of the “rebellion of the Sagebrush of the 1980s, which seeks to have federal lands in the West given to the United States. The child on the poster of the rebellion rose in southeast Jua on July 4, 1980, when several hundred people gathered in Moab, the gate both to Canyonland and on arches of national parks to celebrate the nation’s birthday … and to declare Federal Earth Management Policy.

Politicians in both Wyoming and Utah claim that they can maintain the lands in question better than the federal government.

Whether they could afford to manage land is a reasonable question. As Utah’s legislation opened its session last month, the state was expected to meet a budget deficit ranging from $ 225 million to $ 700 million. Wyoming has been reported to have excess, but long -term forecasts put the state on a shaky financial basis due to their heavy revenue to the revenue related to the extraction of fossil fuels.

Whether the Congress would seriously consider the requests to be doubtful, although some are calling for the sale of federal lands to help provide President Donald Trump’s budget demands.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *