By james art 
Madison, wis. (AP) – The Supreme Court of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin said on Thursday that it would not participate in a pending case, which would determine whether tens of thousands of public sector workers regain the collective negotiation rights, taken away from the 2011 Act.
Justice Brian Heigendor prepared a law known as law 10 when he was the chief legal advocate of the then government. Scott Walker. His decision to withdraw from the case leaves the court with four liberal judges and two conservatives.
The Republican legislative body earlier this week Asks liberal justice Janet Protasevich not to consider the case, since before she joined the court, she called the law unconstitutional, signed a petition to recall Walker during the fight for the law, and went to the Capitol in protest in 2011.
Haberrne, in a brief order on two pages, said the law commanded that he had not heard the case. Democratic MPs on Tuesday called him to retreat.
“The questions raised include questions for which I provided a legal counsel in both the original craft and later in defense of Act 10, including in a case raising almost identical claims under the Federal Constitution,” Haberorn writes.
Protasiewicz did not answer the call that she gave way. Even if he does, the court will still have a 3-2 liberal majority.
Judge on Dan’s County County Last Month The bigger part is canceled from the law, saying that he violates the guarantees of equal protection in the Wisconsin Constitution by dividing civil servants into general and public safety officials. According to the decision, all public sector workers who lost their collective transaction would restore it to what existed before 2011.
The judge placed the decision to detention in anticipation of the complaint. The unions of the school workers who brought the case have asked the Supreme Court to take it directly, jumping over the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Wisconsin has not yet decided whether to bring the case.
Now Hagedorn will not participate in this decision or other trial.
Proponents of the law said it grant local authorities with more control over workers and the powers they need to reduce costs. The cancellation of the law, which allowed the schools and local authorities to raise money through higher contributions from the employees for benefits, will go bankrupt, claim that Act 10 of Act 10.
Democratic opponents claim that the law has harmed schools and other government agencies, depriving employees’ ability to Collectively bargain for their pay and work conditions.