Didi finds a new legal protection that can reject some of his civil affairs – Hotnewhiphop

Didi and his legal team have filed a request to reject a sexual assault case against him by Crystal McKini, who claims he has drugged and sexually attacked in his studio in New York in 2023 “McKini is a woman of faith and when he is She saw news coverage of court cases by Mrs. Cassie Ventura, Mrs. Dickerson-Niel and others, she knew she had a moral obligation to speak, “said McKini’s lawyer Michelle A. Kayola. “[McKinney] She prayed to God before she brought this case, as she was afraid of more violent violence and/or revenge from combs, but in the end she decided that she should speak truth. “

Now, on Monday (January 27), Didi’s lawyers sought the rejection of this case for sexual assault by a letter from his lawyer Erika A. Wolf. They specifically raised the case of sex trafficking against the Alexander brothers as a protection for the dismissal of this case. For those who do not know, these real estate data in Miami were arrested last December on allegations of sexual traffic and attack, and one of the civil cases they are confronted with depends on the law of motivated violence in New York.

In addition, US District Judge Lewis Kaplan has ruled that this legislation does not have a precedent before the broader law on the State Law on Survivated Adults, which has a more resort for restrictions. In this way, Judge Kaplan rejected this civil case against the Alexander brothers because of these time restrictions, which is exactly what the Didi’s team is arguing in his proposal for dismissal. “Parker’s decision further supports the provision [Diddy’s] In anticipation of a proposal for rejection at the time of the case, “his lawyers expressed. It is important to note that this decision of Kaplan is not concerned with the validity of the claims against the Alexander brothers, but rather their applicability in the limits and proper process.

The same applies to Didi, as the efforts of his legal team focus on this logistics issue, not his actual guilt or innocence. If a judge actually supports the magnets of the bad boy in this recent legal move, it can lead to the rejection of various other civil cases against him. However, this will probably not affect his federal criminal case on allegations of sex and racketeering trafficking.